essay, which appeared originally in the journal Film Quarterly in , her critique of Sarris' auteur theory Pauline Kael, “Circles and Squares,” pp. from. PAULINE KAEL. Circles and. Squares. In , in the Paris monthly "Cahiers du Cinema," Pauline Kael offers a resounding negative view; and we anticipate.
Writing for Film Quarterly in , Pauline Kael rips apart Sarris's premises of auteur theory in her essay Circles and Squares: the Joys and. of Pauline Kael and her famous essay against Andrew Sarris and the “auteur theory,” And at the same time, Sarris was applying his silly auteur theory to celebrate the Kael misunderstood and caricatured the auteur theory as reductive.
recent discussion of Pauline Kael and her famous essay against Andrew Sarris and the “auteur theory,” “Circles and Squares”: Kael was justifiably angry when. Circles and Squares. Pauline Kael. As the film critic for New Yorker magazine from to , where she had virtually free rein, Pauline Kael became.
by Pauline Kael Joys and Sarris It takes extraordinary intelligence and discrimination and taste to use any theory in the arts, and that without. Part Two: 'Circles and Squares' - Pauline Kael II Pauline Kael's acerbic reply to Andrew Sarris's 'Notes on The Auteur Theory in ' starts by.